午夜视频在线网站,日韩视频精品在线,中文字幕精品一区二区三区在线,在线播放精品,1024你懂我懂的旧版人,欧美日韩一级黄色片,一区二区三区在线观看视频

分享

【罌粟摘要】嬰兒鼻內(nèi)或靜脈給予納布啡的藥代動力學(xué)和耐受性

 罌粟花anesthGH 2023-07-06 發(fā)布于貴州

嬰兒鼻內(nèi)或靜脈給予納布啡的藥代動力學(xué)和耐受性

貴州醫(yī)科大學(xué)    麻醉與心臟電生理課題組

翻譯:鄧舉          編輯:宋雨婷       審校:曹瑩

目的

鼻內(nèi)給予納布啡可能是一種安全、有效、無創(chuàng)、可替代嬰兒腸道外給藥的方式。本研究目的是評估嬰兒鼻內(nèi)和靜脈給予納布啡的藥代動力學(xué)(PK)和耐受性。

方法

這項前瞻性開放性研究納入1-3個月且接受納布啡進行程序性疼痛管理的嬰兒。將患兒分為靜脈組(靜脈注射0.05mg/kg納布啡)和鼻內(nèi)組(鼻內(nèi)給予0.1mg/kg納布啡)。給藥后15、30、120~180 min采集納布啡PK樣品。采用非室間分析(NCA)計算濃度時間曲線下面積(AUC0-Tlast),并采用Wilcoxon檢驗進行比較。在納布啡給藥和以下干預(yù)措施中評估患兒疼痛評分,干預(yù)措施包括建立靜脈通路、導(dǎo)尿、腰椎穿刺。

結(jié)果

在52名接受納布啡的受試者中,31名符合NCA的條件(11名靜脈注射,20名鼻內(nèi)注射)。靜脈注射0.05mg/kg后的平均AUC0-Tlast為8.7 (IQR:8.0-18.6)μg×L/h,而鼻內(nèi)注射0.1mg/kg后為7.6(5.4-10.4)μg×L/h(P =0.091)。在鼻內(nèi)給藥30 min后,觀察到最高血清濃度(Cmax)為3.5-5.6μg/L。在靜脈注射和鼻內(nèi)給予納布啡期間,分別有71%和67%的受試者記錄了輕度疼痛到無疼痛。

結(jié)論

本研究為第一個調(diào)查嬰兒鼻內(nèi)注射納布啡的研究,表明鼻內(nèi)生物利用度接近50%。無創(chuàng)鼻內(nèi)應(yīng)用的耐受性良好。由于Cmax在鼻內(nèi)給藥后會延遲半小時,需要更多的研究來優(yōu)化給藥和干預(yù)時間。

原始文獻來源

Miriam Pfiffner , Verena Gotta, Marc Pfister,et al.Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of intranasal or intravenous administration of nalbuphine in infants[J].Arch Dis Child 2023;108:56–61.



英文原文

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of intranasal or intravenous administration of nalbuphine in infants

Objectives: Intranasal nalbuphine could be a safe, efficacious and non-invasive alternative to parenteral pain medication in infants. We aimed to assess pharmacokinetics (PK) and tolerability of intranasal and intravenous nalbuphine administration in infants.

Methods: Prospective open-label study including infants 1–3 months of age admitted to the emergency department, receiving nalbuphine for procedural pain management. Patients were alternately allocated to a single nalbuphine dose of 0.05mg/kg intravenously or 0.1mg/kg intranasally. Nalbuphine PK samples were collected 15, 30 and 120–180min after dosing. Area under the concentration time curve (AUC0-Tlast) was calculated by non-compartmental analysis (NCA) and compared by Wilcoxon test. Neonatal Infant Pain Score was assessed during nalbuphine administration and the following interventions: venous access, urinary catheterisation, lumbar puncture.

Results: Out of 52 study subjects receiving nalbuphine, 31 were eligible for NCA (11 intravenous, 20 intranasal). Median AUC0-Tlast after 0.05mg/kg intravenously was 8.7 (IQR: 8.0–18.6) μg×L/hour vs 7.6 (5.4–10.4) μg×L/ hour after intranasal administration of 0.1mg/kg (p=0.091). Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) was observed 30min after intranasal administration (3.5–5.6 μg/L). During intravenous and intranasal nalbuphine administration, mild to no pain was recorded in 71% and 67% of study subjects, respectively.

Conclusion: This is the first study investigating intranasal administration of nalbuphine in infants suggesting an intranasal bioavailability close to 50%. Non-invasive intranasal application was well tolerated. Additional studies are warranted to optimise dosing and timing of interventions as Cmax is delayed by half an hour after intranasal administration.

    轉(zhuǎn)藏 分享 獻花(0

    0條評論

    發(fā)表

    請遵守用戶 評論公約

    類似文章 更多