嬰兒鼻內(nèi)或靜脈給予納布啡的藥代動力學(xué)和耐受性 貴州醫(yī)科大學(xué) 麻醉與心臟電生理課題組 翻譯:鄧舉 編輯:宋雨婷 審校:曹瑩 鼻內(nèi)給予納布啡可能是一種安全、有效、無創(chuàng)、可替代嬰兒腸道外給藥的方式。本研究目的是評估嬰兒鼻內(nèi)和靜脈給予納布啡的藥代動力學(xué)(PK)和耐受性。 這項前瞻性開放性研究納入1-3個月且接受納布啡進行程序性疼痛管理的嬰兒。將患兒分為靜脈組(靜脈注射0.05mg/kg納布啡)和鼻內(nèi)組(鼻內(nèi)給予0.1mg/kg納布啡)。給藥后15、30、120~180 min采集納布啡PK樣品。采用非室間分析(NCA)計算濃度時間曲線下面積(AUC0-Tlast),并采用Wilcoxon檢驗進行比較。在納布啡給藥和以下干預(yù)措施中評估患兒疼痛評分,干預(yù)措施包括建立靜脈通路、導(dǎo)尿、腰椎穿刺。 在52名接受納布啡的受試者中,31名符合NCA的條件(11名靜脈注射,20名鼻內(nèi)注射)。靜脈注射0.05mg/kg后的平均AUC0-Tlast為8.7 (IQR:8.0-18.6)μg×L/h,而鼻內(nèi)注射0.1mg/kg后為7.6(5.4-10.4)μg×L/h(P =0.091)。在鼻內(nèi)給藥30 min后,觀察到最高血清濃度(Cmax)為3.5-5.6μg/L。在靜脈注射和鼻內(nèi)給予納布啡期間,分別有71%和67%的受試者記錄了輕度疼痛到無疼痛。 結(jié)論 本研究為第一個調(diào)查嬰兒鼻內(nèi)注射納布啡的研究,表明鼻內(nèi)生物利用度接近50%。無創(chuàng)鼻內(nèi)應(yīng)用的耐受性良好。由于Cmax在鼻內(nèi)給藥后會延遲半小時,需要更多的研究來優(yōu)化給藥和干預(yù)時間。 原始文獻來源 Miriam Pfiffner , Verena Gotta, Marc Pfister,et al.Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of intranasal or intravenous administration of nalbuphine in infants[J].Arch Dis Child 2023;108:56–61. 英文原文 Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of intranasal or intravenous administration of nalbuphine in infants Objectives: Intranasal nalbuphine could be a safe, efficacious and non-invasive alternative to parenteral pain medication in infants. We aimed to assess pharmacokinetics (PK) and tolerability of intranasal and intravenous nalbuphine administration in infants. Methods: Prospective open-label study including infants 1–3 months of age admitted to the emergency department, receiving nalbuphine for procedural pain management. Patients were alternately allocated to a single nalbuphine dose of 0.05mg/kg intravenously or 0.1mg/kg intranasally. Nalbuphine PK samples were collected 15, 30 and 120–180min after dosing. Area under the concentration time curve (AUC0-Tlast) was calculated by non-compartmental analysis (NCA) and compared by Wilcoxon test. Neonatal Infant Pain Score was assessed during nalbuphine administration and the following interventions: venous access, urinary catheterisation, lumbar puncture. Results: Out of 52 study subjects receiving nalbuphine, 31 were eligible for NCA (11 intravenous, 20 intranasal). Median AUC0-Tlast after 0.05mg/kg intravenously was 8.7 (IQR: 8.0–18.6) μg×L/hour vs 7.6 (5.4–10.4) μg×L/ hour after intranasal administration of 0.1mg/kg (p=0.091). Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) was observed 30min after intranasal administration (3.5–5.6 μg/L). During intravenous and intranasal nalbuphine administration, mild to no pain was recorded in 71% and 67% of study subjects, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first study investigating intranasal administration of nalbuphine in infants suggesting an intranasal bioavailability close to 50%. Non-invasive intranasal application was well tolerated. Additional studies are warranted to optimise dosing and timing of interventions as Cmax is delayed by half an hour after intranasal administration. |
|
來自: 罌粟花anesthGH > 《待分類》